Analyze Diet
PloS one2023; 18(4); e0284105; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284105

Prevalence of vertical movement asymmetries at trot in Standardbred and Swedish Warmblood foals.

Abstract: Many horses, just before and during their athletic career, show vertical movement asymmetries, to the same degree as clinically lame horses. It is unknown whether these asymmetries are caused by pain or have alternative explanations, such as inherent biological variation. In the latter case, movement asymmetries would be expected to be present at a very young age. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of movement asymmetries in foals. Motion analysis, using an inertial measurement unit-based system (Equinosis), was performed on 54 foals (31 Swedish Warmbloods, 23 Standardbreds) during straight-line trot. The foals were between 4-13 weeks old and considered sound by their owners. Differences between the vertical minimum and maximum values recorded for the head (HDmin, HDmax) and pelvis (PDmin, PDmax) between left and right stance were calculated for each stride and an average was computed for each trial. Thresholds for asymmetry were defined as absolute trial mean >6 mm for HDmin and HDmax, and >3 mm for PDmin and PDmax. These thresholds were exceeded for one or several parameters by 83% of Standardbred foals and 45% of Swedish Warmblood foals, demonstrating surprisingly high prevalence of asymmetries in young foals, although the risk of repetitive strain injuries and cumulative risk of trauma injuries was expected to be low in this age group. Standardbred foals showed similar prevalence of asymmetries to that reported previously for yearling Standardbred trotters, so relatively higher prevalence of movement asymmetries may be expected among trotters as a breed. In general, vertical head and pelvic movement asymmetries can be anticipated among foals considered sound by their owners. A better understanding of the aetiology of asymmetries is needed for correct interpretation of objective symmetry measurements in different populations of horses.
Publication Date: 2023-04-06 PubMed ID: 37023102PubMed Central: PMC10079035DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284105Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This is a study about movement asymmetries in foals, specifically focusing on Standardbred and Swedish Warmblood breeds. The research finds a surprising prevalence of these asymmetries in young horses, thought to be sound, with Standardbred foals exhibiting a higher rate of such irregularities.

Objective of the Study

  • The study aims to determine the prevalence of movement asymmetries in foals, specifically in Standardbred and Swedish Warmblood breeds. By discovering when these asymmetries manifest, the study aimed to ascertain whether these were indicative of lameness or issues arising from inherent biological variations.

Methodology

  • Motion analysis was used to study 54 foals between the ages of 4-13 weeks. This group comprised 31 Swedish Warmbloods and 23 Standardbreds. All foals were considered sound by their owners.
  • The measurement system used was called Equinosis. It calculated differences between the vertical minimum and maximum values recorded for the head and pelvis during both left and right strides. These calculations were averaged for each trial.
  • Thresholds for asymmetry were defined as any absolute trial mean greater than 6mm for head measurements and above 3mm for pelvic measurements.

Key Findings

  • The study found high rates of movement asymmetries in young foals. This was surprising, given their young age, as it was expected that these foals would have a low risk of repetitive strain injuries and cumulative risk of trauma injuries.
  • The results showed that 83% of Standardbred foals and 45% of Swedish Warmblood foals exceeded the asymmetry thresholds for one or several of the parameters measured.
  • This suggests that movement asymmetries can be expected in foals considered sound by their owners, particularly among Standardbred foals which showed similar prevalence of asymmetries to yearling Standardbred trotters previously studied. This suggests that as a breed, trotters may inherently have a higher prevalence of movement asymmetries.

Implications

  • The findings of the study underline the need for a better understanding of the cause of these asymmetries for their correct interpretation in different horse populations.
  • More comprehensive knowledge about these asymmetries would aid in defining what constitutes a healthy, sound young horse, and potentially highlight early signs of problems that could affect a horse’s athletic abilities later in life.

Cite This Article

APA
Zetterberg E, Leclercq A, Persson-Sjodin E, Lundblad J, Haubro Andersen P, Hernlund E, Rhodin M. (2023). Prevalence of vertical movement asymmetries at trot in Standardbred and Swedish Warmblood foals. PLoS One, 18(4), e0284105. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284105

Publication

ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 18
Issue: 4
Pages: e0284105

Researcher Affiliations

Zetterberg, Ebba
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Leclercq, Anna
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Persson-Sjodin, Emma
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lundblad, Johan
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Haubro Andersen, Pia
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hernlund, Elin
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rhodin, Marie
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses
  • Animals
  • Prevalence
  • Sweden / epidemiology
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Head
  • Lameness, Animal
  • Forelimb
  • Gait

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

This article includes 45 references
  1. Buchner HH, Savelberg HH, Schamhardtt H, Barneveld A. Head and trunk movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced fore-or hindlimb lameness. Equine Vet J 1996;28(1): 71–76.
  2. Kramer J, Keegan KG, Kelmer G, Wilson DA. Objective determination of pelvic movement during hind limb lameness by use of a signal decomposition method and pelvic height differences. Am J Vet Res 2004;65: 741–747.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.741pubmed: 15198212google scholar: lookup
  3. Starke SD, Raistrick KJ, May SA, Pfau T. The effect of trotting speed on the evaluation of subtle lameness in horses. Vet J 2013;197: 245–252.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.03.006pubmed: 23611486google scholar: lookup
  4. Fuller CJ, Bladon BM, Driver AJ, Barr ARS. The intra- and inter-assessor reliability of measurement of functional outcome by lameness scoring in horses. Vet J 2006;171: 281–286.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.10.012pubmed: 16490710google scholar: lookup
  5. Keegan KG, Dent EV, Wilson DA, Janicek J, Kramer J, Lacarrubba A. Repeatability of subjective evaluation of lameness in horses. Equine Vet J 2010;42: 92–97.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X479568pubmed: 20156242google scholar: lookup
  6. Pfau T, Sepulveda Caviedes MF, McCarthy R, Cheetham L, Forbes B, Rhodin M. Comparison of visual lameness scores to gait asymmetry in racing Thoroughbreds during trot in-hand. Equine Vet Educ 2020;32: 191–198.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12914google scholar: lookup
  7. Hammarberg M, Egenvall A, Pfau T, Rhodin M. Rater agreement of visual lameness assessment in horses during lungeing. Equine Vet J 2016;48: 78–82.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12385pmc: PMC4964936pubmed: 25399722google scholar: lookup
  8. Parkes RSV, Weller R, Groth AM, May S, Pfau T. Evidence of the development of “domain-restricted” expertise in the recognition of asymmetric motion characteristics of hindlimb lameness in the horse. Equine Vet J 2009;41: 112–117.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408x343000pubmed: 19418737google scholar: lookup
  9. Arkell M, Archer RM, Guitian FJ, May SA. Evidence of bias affecting the interpretation of the results of local anaesthetic nerve blocks when assessing lameless in horses. Vet Rec 2006;159: 346–349.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.159.11.346pubmed: 16963714google scholar: lookup
  10. Pfau T, Parkes RS, Burden ER, Bell N, Fairhurst H, Witte TH. Movement asymmetry in working polo horses. Equine Vet J 2016;48: 517–522.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12467pubmed: 26037947google scholar: lookup
  11. Rhodin M, Egenvall A, Andersen PH, Pfau T. Head and pelvic movement asymmetries at trot in riding horses in training and perceived as free from lameness by the owner. PLoS One 2017;12.
  12. Maliye S, Marshall JF. Objective assessment of the compensatory effect of clinical hind limb lameness in horses: 37 cases (2011–2014). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2016;249: 940–944.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.249.8.940pubmed: 27700267google scholar: lookup
  13. Maliye S, Voute LC, Marshall JF. Naturally-occurring forelimb lameness in the horse results in significant compensatory load redistribution during trotting. Vet J 2015;204: 208–213.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.03.005pubmed: 25862395google scholar: lookup
  14. Kallerud AS, Fjordbakk CT, Hendrickson EHS, Persson-Sjodin E, Hammarberg M, Rhodin M. Objectively measured movement asymmetry in yearling Standardbred trotters. Equine Vet J 2021;53: 590–599.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13302pubmed: 32558997google scholar: lookup
  15. Jansson A, Ringmark S, Johansson L, Roepstorff L. Locomotion asymmetry in young Standardbred trotters in training and links to future racing career. Comp Exerc Physiol 2022;18: 85–92.
    doi: 10.3920/cep210035google scholar: lookup
  16. van Weeren PR, Pfau T, Rhodin M, Roepstorff L, Serra Bragança F, Weishaupt MA. Do we have to redefine lameness in the era of quantitative gait analysis?. Equine Veterinary Journal 2017. pp. 567–569.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12715pubmed: 28804943google scholar: lookup
  17. Van Grevenhof EM, Ducro BJ, Van Weeren PR, Van Tartwijk JMFM, Van Den Belt AJ, Bijma P. Prevalence of various radiographic manifestations of osteochondrosis and their correlations between and within joints in Dutch Warmblood horses. Equine Vet J 2009;41: 11–16.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408x334794pubmed: 19301576google scholar: lookup
  18. Hoppe F. Radiological investigations of osteochondrosis dissecans in Standardbred Trotters and Swedish Warmblood horses. Equine Vet J 1984;16(5): 425–429.
  19. Lykkjen S, Roed KH, Dolvik NI. Osteochondrosis and osteochondral fragments in Standardbred trotters: Prevalence and relationships. Equine Vet J 2012;44: 332–338.
  20. Stock KF, Hamann H, Distl O. Prevalence of Osseous Fragments in Distal and Proximal Interphalangeal, Metacarpo-and Metatarsophalangeal and Tarsocrural Joints of Hanoverian Warmblood Horses. J Vet. Med. A 2005;52: 388–394.
  21. Sandgren B, Dalin G, Carlsten J. Osteochondrosis in the tarsocrural joint and osteochondral fragments in the fetlock joints in Standardbred trotters. I. Epidemiology. Equine Vet J 1993;25: 31–37.
  22. McIlwraith CW. Surgical versus conservative management of osteochondrosis. Veterinary Journal 2013. pp. 19–28.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.03.037pubmed: 23746868google scholar: lookup
  23. Gorissen BMC, Wolschrijn CF, Serra Bragança FM, Geerts AAJ, Leenders WOJL, Back W. The development of locomotor kinetics in the foal and the effect of osteochondrosis. Equine Vet J 2017;49: 467–474.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12649pmc: PMC5484372pubmed: 27859501google scholar: lookup
  24. Dik KJ, Enzerink E, Van Weeren PR. Osteochondrosis and musculoskeletal development Radiographic development of osteochondral abnormalities, in the hock and stifle of Dutch Warmblood foals, from age 1 to 11 months. Equine vet. J. Suppl. 1999;31: 9–15.
    pubmed: 10999655
  25. Ringmark S, Jansson A, Lindholm A, Hedenström U, Roepstorff L. A 2.5 year study on health and locomotion symmetry in young Standardbred horses subjected to two levels of high intensity training distance. Vet J 2016;207: 99–104.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.10.052pubmed: 26654845google scholar: lookup
  26. Murphy J, Sutherland A, Arkins S. Idiosyncratic motor laterality in the horse. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005;91: 297–310.
  27. van Heel MCV, van Dierendonck MC, Kroekenstoel AM, Back W. Lateralised motor behaviour leads to increased unevenness in front feet and asymmetry in athletic performance in young mature Warmblood horses. Equine Vet J 2010;42: 444–450.
  28. McGreevy PD, Rogers LJ. Motor and sensory laterality in thoroughbred horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005;92: 337–352.
  29. Drevemo S, Fredricson I, Hjertén G, Mcmiken D. Early development of gait asymmetries in trotting Standardbred colts. Equine Vet J 1987;19: 189–191.
  30. Lucidi P, Bacco G, Sticco M, Mazzoleni G, Benvenuti M, Bernabò N. Assessment of motor laterality in foals and young horses (Equus caballus) through an analysis of derailment at trot. Physiol Behav 2013;109: 8–13.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.11.006pubmed: 23201413google scholar: lookup
  31. Parma V, Brasselet R, Zoia S, Bulgheroni M, Castiello U. The origin of human handedness and its role in pre-birth motor control. Sci Rep 2017;7.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16827-ypmc: PMC5711880pubmed: 29196664google scholar: lookup
  32. Hepper PG, Wells DL, Lynch C. Prenatal thumb sucking is related to postnatal handedness. Neuropsychologia 2005;43: 313–315.
  33. Keegan KG, Kramer J, Yonezawa Y, Maki H, Frank Pai P, Dent EV. Assessment of repeatability of a wireless, inertial sensor-based lameness evaluation system for horses. Am J Vet Res 2011;72: 1156–1163.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.72.9.1156pubmed: 21879972google scholar: lookup
  34. Hunt RJ, Baker WT. Routine Orthopedic Evaluation in Foals. Veterinary Clinics of North America—Equine Practice 2017. pp. 253–266.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2017.03.011pubmed: 28687091google scholar: lookup
  35. Sandgren B, Dalin G, Carlsten J, Lundehelmt N. Development of osteochondrosis in the tarsocrural joint and osteochondral fragments in the fetlock joints of Standardbred trotters. I I. Body measurements and clinical findings. Equine vet J. Suppl. 1993;16: 48–53.
  36. Keegan KG, MacAllister CG, Wilson DA, Gedon CA, Kramer J, Yonezawa Y. Comparison of an inertial sensor system with a stationary force plate for evaluation of horses with bilateral forelimb lameness. Am J Vet Res 2012;73: 368–374.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.3.368pubmed: 22369528google scholar: lookup
  37. Serra Bragança FM, Roepstorff C, Rhodin M, Pfau T, van Weeren PR, Roepstorff L. Quantitative lameness assessment in the horse based on upper body movement symmetry: The effect of different filtering techniques on the quantification of motion symmetry. Biomed Signal Process Control 2020;57: 101674.
  38. Peham C, Licka T, Girtler D, Scheidl M. The Influence of Lameness on Equine Stride Length Consistency. Vet J 2001;162: 153–157.
    doi: 10.1053/tvjl.2001.0593pubmed: 11531399google scholar: lookup
  39. Denham SF, Staniar WB, Dascanio JJ, Phillips AB, Splan RK. Linear and Temporal Kinematics of the Walk in Warmblood Foals. J Equine Vet Sci 2012;32: 112–115.
  40. Jäderkvist K, Holm N, Imsland F, Árnason T, Andersson L, Andersson LS. The importance of the DMRT3 “Gait keeper” mutation on riding traits and gaits in Standardbred and Icelandic horses. Livest Sci 2015;176: 33–39.
  41. Fegraeus KJ, Johansson L, Maenpaa M, Mykkanen A, Andersson LS, Velie BD. Different DMRT3 genotypes are best adapted for harness racing and riding in finnhorses. J Hered 2015;106: 734–740.
    doi: 10.1093/jhered/esv062pubmed: 26285915google scholar: lookup
  42. Byström A, Clayton HM, Hernlund E, Rhodin M, Egenvall A. Equestrian and biomechanical perspectives on laterality in the horse. Comparative Exercise Physiology 2020. pp. 35–45.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP190022google scholar: lookup
  43. Persson-Sjodin E, Hernlund E, Pfau T, Andersen PH, Forsström KH, Rhodin M. Effect of meloxicam treatment on movement asymmetry in riding horses in training. PLoS One 2019;14.
  44. Pfau T, Weller R. Comparison of a standalone consumer grade smartphone with a specialist inertial measurement unit for quantification of movement symmetry in the trotting horse. Equine Vet J 2017;49: 124–129.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12529pubmed: 26518143google scholar: lookup
  45. Keegan KG, Wilson DA, Kramer J, Reed SK, Yonezawa Y, Maki H. Comparison of a body-mounted inertial sensor system-based method with subjective evaluation for detection of lameness in horses. Am J Vet Res 2013;74: 17–24.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.74.1.17pubmed: 23270341google scholar: lookup